Hemeixin Electronics Co.,Ltd.
It`s getting harder to fit everything in the box; it`s also getting more costly. One solution promising to help designers meet the size constraint head on is rigid-flex PCB technology, but most design teams try to avoid using rigid-flex PCBs when product cost is an issue. But is it really as expensive as we think?
To begin with, consider the cost of the traditional rigid-cable-rigid PCB assembly to one based on rigid-flex technology. The former construction works well for short-run designs; however, it requires connectors on each board and the interconect, all of which drive up BoM cost. Additionally, the rigid-cable-rigid design is prone to `cold joints`, and reduced service life. In contrast, rigid-flex circuits eliminate these joints, making them much more reliable and able to deliver overall higher product quality and longevity. So while rigid-flex PCB technology is certainly not new, various considerations now make it much more viable – not the least of which is cost.
Simulate the cost
Rigid-flex PCBs are combination of flexible and rigid substrates laminated into a
single package. Rigid Flex PCBs have been used in the military and
aerospace industries for more than 20 years. Due to rigid-flex allow designers to
replace multiple PCBs interconnected with connectors, wires and ribbon
cables with a single package offering improved performance and reliability.
Rigid-Flex successfully used for applications in the mobile phone and
consumer products in the past few years.
In some designs, rigid-flex will not be a viable alternative, and you must do your
due diligencein determining the break-even point where the costs are about equal.
This kind of price simulation can be done by considering the total quoted costs
for fabrication and assembly. The PCBs can be quoted before design, as long
as the parameters of design are well understood (for example, the layer stack,
estimated via count,track and space ratios, etc.).
High layer count is more complex, high performance and high reliability PCBs with
the advantages of reducing emissions, increasing immunity and improving
signal quality for high-speed servers, network systems and telecommunication
base station equipment to ensure long term reliable infrastructure.
and a comparative rigid-cable-rigid equivalent. The component BoMs for comparison
differed only in the cable and connectors required for the
non-flex version. For our simulation, the traditional design is comprised of four-layer boards that use flexible cable and connectors between them, while the rigid-flex design is a four-layer PCB with two inner flex layers. Manufacturing cost for both designs is based on real PCB fabricator quotes, and includes the cost of assembly
This quote-generated cost plot compares a rigid-flex design to a rigid-cable-rigid assembly.
Find your break-even point
As the project volume depicted in above picture hits 100 units, the rigid-flex design becomes a more cost-effective option compared to the traditional design approach.
A key reason for this cost savings is that rigid-flex circuits do not use connectors/cables or require any connector assembly. Also, they feature increased reliability and process yields. But that`s just the tip ofthe iceberg.
There are plenty of good reasons to use rigid flex circuits. They are light, compact, robust, and resilient, and ideal fortoday`s smaller and more portable electronics. They are ideal for new product designs, but can be used toreplace traditional wire harnesses and circuit boards as
well. But to realize their full potential, designers mustconsider the unique requirements
of these circuits and the materials they are made of. It is important torecognize
that, while the materials that comprise a flex circuit may be individually flexible, their performance in a completed circuit is greatly impacted by a circuit`s construction.
Because rigid-flex PCBs require no cable assembly, their overall assembly
effort is reduced, as is their test complexity – both of which drive down cost.
Additionally, fewer components need to be purchased, reducing the supply
chain risk. Rigid-flex PCBs can be designed to make product maintenance
more convenient and therefore, more cost-effective over the course of the
Every rigid flex circuit has a neutral bend axis. This plane, which is ideally
located on thecentral plane of the materialstack, experiences, at least in theory,
no compression or tension forces when the circuit is flexed. Toward theoutside
of the bend, however, outer layers experience increasing tension, which can
tear or crack the materials.This can lead to immediate circuit failure or,
potentially worse, hairline breaks that will fail after the circuit hasbeen put into
service. Toward the inside of the bend, layers are subject to increasing compression. This cancause layers to wrinkle or delaminate, again a potential cause of immediate or eventual failure. Careful designcan help prevent these problems.